SWITZERLAND provided USD
3 billion in official development assistance (ODA) in 2012, or 0.45% of
its gross national income (GNI), in line with its goal to reach 0.5% of
GNI by 2015.
In a new Peer Review of Switzerland, the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee
(DAC) welcomed the country’s progress in channelling more resources into fighting
poverty and sharpening its development policies in line with the DAC’s 2009 recommendations.
In particular, Switzerland complied with recommendations to make poverty reduction
and sustainability an overarching goal for all its aid and for its aid agencies
to co-operate more with federal Swiss bodies working in fragile states in areas
like diplomacy and migration.
Noting its history of neutrality and pioneering humanitarian work, the DAC encouraged
Switzerland to play more of a leadership role in development co-operation, particularly
with regard to helping maximise the amount of private finance going into development
projects.
“Switzerland’s ODA has increased steadily since 2010 and its policy of long-term
commitments to recipient countries serves as an example to others,” said OECD
DAC Chair Erik Solheim. “Switzerland is well-placed to become a more visible
leader on development issues and can capitalise on its extensive experience on
the ground to influence global policy in areas like conflict, fragility, food
security and climate change.”
Given Switzerland now ranks as a mid-sized donor, positioned between Norway and
Denmark as the DAC’s 11th biggest provider of aid by volume, the DAC recommended
it work on ramping up its successful small-scale development projects into regional
or national programmes whose size can enable more efficiency and sustainability.
Switzerland has shown that it has the right tools, systems and understanding
of political risk to work in fragile states that need long-term support. The
Review suggests that it focus more of its aid resources in such countries. Switzerland
should also ensure that the share of its bilateral ODA going to least-developed
countries does not decrease further. This is important given a shift in OECD
countries' net bilateral ODA flows away from the poorest countries.
The DAC praised Switzerland’s effective management systems for development co-operation
and its shift to more streamlined and decentralised procedures for field offices.
However it noted that staffing policies need to ensure the right skills over
the long term.
As a major international financial centre that is home to many multinational
companies working in developing countries, Switzerland can add value by continuing
to work to ensure correct and transparent taxation of individuals and companies,
the Review noted.
Each DAC member is peer reviewed every 4-5 years as a way to monitor its development
co-operation, hold it accountable for past commitments and recommend improvements.
Led by two DAC members, a review typically takes 6-8 months and involves interviews
with the government of the country under review and officials, other donors,
civil society and the private sector in developing countries. Read more here:
www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/.
|